Employment Issues

In the course of an employment tribunal hearing for unfair dismissal, issues arose as to the true reason for the dismissal and whether it had been reasonable for the respondent to conclude that the claimant was guilty of dishonesty.

A witness for the respondent had given evidence stating that he understood that the police had referred a file concerning the claimant to the Crown Prosecution Service. No criminal charges were ever brought though. The employment judge proceeded to hear the issue of unfair dismissal without the claimant giving evidence, stating that there nothing relevant to be cross-examined at that hearing. The claimant appealed.

On appeal, it was held that the claimant’s evidence and cross-examination of it was relevant to the issues the employment judge had to decide. He should not have proceeded without hearing it. He should have waited to see if the claimant had claimed any privilege against self-incrimination or made an application to adjourn the hearing.

The facts of the case in brief are that the claimant was employed as a porter who was expected to work a 96 hour shift cycle. It was found that between 2007 and 2014 on 41 occasions the claimant had claimed overtime on the basis that another porter was on leave whereas on those dates, records show the other porter was at work. There had been an overpayment of approximately £7,000. The claimant was dismissed on the grounds of dishonesty. Whilst he accepted that the overtime was wrongly claimed, he stated it was by reason of error, not dishonesty.

 

June 2017

New Year : Online Scams

In recent light of the 'Whatsapp Gold' text scam, we look at the dangers of online scams, fraud and circulating malware.

More Info

Do you know your Consumer Rights?

In the lead up to Christmas, knowing your rights as a consumer is as important as ever.

More Info

Reigning in the rogue bailiffs

Aggressive bailiffs are set to face renewed scrutiny under new plans to end intimidating practices and better protect vulnerable people.

More Info

Right to refuse a business tenancy cannot be misused

An interesting case is currently making its way through the court system and may have far reaching implications for the landlord/tenant relationship in relation to tenancy renewals

More Info

Reviews

We’re proud to be associated with

  • The Law Society, Conveyancing Quality Accredited logo
  • The Law Society, Children Law Accredited logo
  • The Law Society, Criminal Litigation Accredited logo
  • The Law Society, Family Law Accredited logo
  • The Law Society, Family Law Advanced Accredited logo
  • The Law Society, Lexcel Accredited logo
  • Solicitors For The Elderly Accredited logo
  • Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners logo
  • Dementia Friends logo
  • Resolution logo